Control emissions at the cylinder level, with Zero CO, Zero HC and near zero NO

  • Home
  • Environment
  • Cylinder
    • Design space
    • Concept
    • Background
    • Testing
  • Engine
    • Commercial engine
    • Racing
    • Wind Power
  • Physics
    • Physics Of Time
    • Time-Mechanics framework
    • Abstracts
  • Licensing
    • Industrial position
    • Market
  • Contact
  • More
    • Home
    • Environment
    • Cylinder
      • Design space
      • Concept
      • Background
      • Testing
    • Engine
      • Commercial engine
      • Racing
      • Wind Power
    • Physics
      • Physics Of Time
      • Time-Mechanics framework
      • Abstracts
    • Licensing
      • Industrial position
      • Market
    • Contact
  • Sign In

  • My Account
  • Signed in as:

  • filler@godaddy.com


  • My Account
  • Sign out

Signed in as:

filler@godaddy.com

  • Home
  • Environment
  • Cylinder
    • Design space
    • Concept
    • Background
    • Testing
  • Engine
    • Commercial engine
    • Racing
    • Wind Power
  • Physics
    • Physics Of Time
    • Time-Mechanics framework
    • Abstracts
  • Licensing
    • Industrial position
    • Market
  • Contact

Account

  • My Account
  • Sign out

  • Sign In
  • My Account

Alternative solution

Gearing and brakes

The Relative Motion Engine Alternative

    

Alternative Solution: Stabilizing Wind Generation with a Relative‑Motion Cylinder

Plain summary
Large wind turbines suffer from gearbox/brake wear and from the challenge of keeping generator speed and grid power quality stable under gusty winds. Today, some projects use hydraulic/pneumatic buffers or curtailment to manage these transients—often with significant efficiency and maintenance penalties. Our proposal is a hybrid stabilizer: pair a wind rotor with a Relative‑Motion Engine (RME) cylinder that acts as a high‑efficiency, pressure‑coupled buffer and supplemental prime mover, smoothing torque to the generator while improving availability.

The problem we’re solving

  • High O&M: Gearboxes and mechanical brakes in multi‑MW turbines carry heavy lifecycle costs.
  • Speed/torque volatility: Gusts and wind shear create torque spikes and speed dips that stress drivetrains and force curtailment.
  • Inefficient buffering: Conventional accumulators can incur substantial losses when compressing air to high pressures and add complexity.

The RME‑hybrid concept

Two inputs, one stabilized output:

  • Input A – Wind rotor → compressor/turbo stage. Rotor power drives a compressor/turbo that pressurizes the RME’s floating‑piston side, creating an internal, every‑cycle charging effect.
  • Input B – Auxiliary prime mover → crankshaft piston. A hydraulic or combustion prime mover couples to the main piston/crank, ensuring dispatchable torque when wind lulls.
  • Output – Generator shaft. The crankshaft delivers smoothed torque to the generator. The floating piston is initially pressure‑driven (decoupled) and then linked via two rods in the production intent design to stabilize its motion and capture a small net positive contribution.

Control levers: compressor flow/PR control, piston timing/geometry, and ECU maps (spark/SoI/EGR for combustion variants) regulate shaft speed and ramp‑rates.

Why this can beat standard accumulators (design intent)

  • Higher conversion efficiency (component‑level). Targeted compressor/turbo stages in this class can achieve ~80–85% isentropic efficiency; by coupling directly into the RME’s pressure‑wave charging rather than storing and re‑expanding air in tanks, we aim to reduce round‑trip losses. (To be verified in prototype tests.)
  • Continuous smoothing, not start/stop. The RME provides cycle‑by‑cycle torque shaping, acting like a controllable mechanical buffer rather than a binary reservoir.
  • Lower maintenance pathway. Reduced brake duty and gentler gearbox transients can extend component life; parts count is minimized compared to large accumulator farms.

Grid‑facing benefits (targets)

  • Ramp‑rate compliance without curtailment during gusts.
  • Frequency response by modulating RME load/assist within seconds.
  • Higher renewable utilization on constrained feeders—enabling higher instantaneous wind penetration before the next turbine or storage build. (Requires site‑specific grid studies.)

Environmental angle

  • Less curtailment = less wasted wind. Better smoothing means more clean energy delivered per installed MW.
  • Right‑sized hardware. A mechanical buffer that reduces reliance on frequent braking and on large pneumatic storage can cut materials, maintenance trips, and spares.
  • Hybrid flexibility. Works with low‑carbon fuels (bio/e‑fuels/renewable gas) or hydraulic assist for fully fuel‑free operation.

What’s a credible claim today vs. tomorrow

We can claim by design (now):

  • The RME’s floating piston converts compressor pressure into every‑cycle charging, letting the crank see a smoother, more controllable torque.
  • The architecture relocates part of the compression/expansion work into the same cycle, enabling efficient buffering without large external tanks.

We will prove by test (next):

  • Measured round‑trip efficiency vs. a baseline accumulator system.
  • Ramp‑rate control and speed stability under synthetic gust profiles.
  • O&M deltas: brake duty cycles, gearbox torque ripple, and thermal loads.

Pilot path

  1. Model‑in‑the‑loop: aeroelastic + drivetrain + RME co‑simulation to size compressor stages and control loops.
  2. 1:10 rig: hardware‑in‑the‑loop with a motor‑emulated rotor and a 100–200 kW generator.
  3. 1 MW field pilot: side‑by‑side with an accumulator‑based system to compare ramp‑rate, curtailment, and maintenance.

Bottom line

Instead of absorbing wind variability with brakes or lossy storage alone, the RME‑hybrid uses pressure‑wave mechanics to stabilize generator speed in real time, aiming for higher delivered energy, better component life, and a cleaner cost curve. It’s a practical, near‑term complement to batteries and grid upgrades—designed to make each installed turbine do more, more often.

Copyright © 2019 Relative-Motion- All Rights Reserved.


All material on this website including but not limited to text, images, videos, graphics, animation, physics methods and equations  and other materials (herein "content") are subject to the copyright and other intellectual property rights.  Content of this website is for personal use only and may not be reproduced, communicated or published, in whole or in part, for any purpose without the express written consent of this website ownership.


Limitations of liabilities

Any and all information on this website is provided "as is" with no warranties as to the accuracy, adequacy, completeness, or appropriateness for any particular use. This website disclaims liability for any errors  or damages whatsoever that may arise out of or in connection with the use of this website, even after any advice of the possibility of such damages. This statement applies however only to the extent permitted by applicable laws.

  • Concept
  • Background
  • Testing
  • Commercial engine
  • Racing
  • Wind Power

Powered by

Cookie Policy

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.

Accept & Close