Control emissions at the cylinder level



Mr Manufacture


Mr X (Manufacture ) asked: We see fuel saving with the Relative Motion Method, but why do you think we need to use it while the market is moving towards electric?

Mr X: Relative Motion Mechanics is the Future of engine

for the following reasons:

· Relative-Motion Engine can make the core of our models to operate electric generators, where the Electric Car Market is only an electric battery operator.

· Enhanced performance on the full range of engine revolving speed.

· Enhanced profit margins, by the tremendous cut on fuel consumption. 

·  Refined and lower engine noise, and

·  Lower air pollutant emissions.

· Decreased engine volume and cost, per unit of torque output.

· Enhanced durability, and lesser maintenance requirements due to its lower thermal output, and lower operating RPM requirements for given level of performance,

· By adding only one major unique working hybrid part a “floating piston” in each of our elongated engine cylinders.

· Lower Operational Cost and Maintenance Cost, with its lower engine speed that obtains greater output.

Fuel vehicles cost about $12,000 less than an average comparable battery operated (electric) vehicles, and we believe that this financial benefit will drive the political will the other way around.

Mr Environment


· Mr Environment an (Auto expert) said: Due to environmental regulations, I expect Electric car will replace the combustion engine completely by 2040.

The answer simply is, battery operated vehicles that cost more than $12,000 average, may replace passenger vehicles in certain advanced parts of the world only, while many other developing parts of the world, will need urgent enhancements on combustion methods; and we believe commercial vehicles will continue to completely depend on internal combustion .

The future of energy trend, is to diversify and have balanced sourcing approach, where the fossil fuel source will support a main market share. 

We can see that Electric cars will have important market presence, but while it could take a big share from the passenger car market, we do not see that happening with commercial cars where more torque and weight need continue with the combustion engine solution.



Different Parts of the world shall need to generate electricity, even with fossil fuels, and to transfer electricity to vehicles for multiple battery re-charges at many future homes and road locations. That need exists to generate additional electricity to compensate for the electric wire travel losses, to reach the many remote and usual electric car users.

Electrical driven cars need costly POWER Reserves, when Solar Power has no Sun for a few days to operate and generate electricity, and/or in conjunction with any Wind power losses that occur.

The electric storage needs, would have to rely mainly with any locally hydraulic produced electricity and from fossil fueled Power Generating units.  

Varied sizes of larger Relative Motion Engines can be utilized to generate the needed electric power as a local supplier at better fuel efficiency than electric generating turbines that burn natural gas or oil and exhaust their flue gases at 900 degrees F.  The Relative Motion Engine shall benefit as a reliable local electric power supplier for that market.


Let us not forget the additional pollution created by battery production factories and their added battery production waste disposal. That alone will in the future, require balancing that pollution potential. 

The Relative-Motion Concepts have to apply, not only to internal combustion methods in an engine, but to local electric generation, where we can move again from the battery model to the generator car model, which is out of the scope of this page at this moment.

Industrial Trend


It is possible that our World is moving to more centralized business models, with less retail overhead, yet with the potential mileage efficiency gains furnished by the Relative Motion Means, the electricity cost when generated from fossil fuels with  a Relative Motion Method, in a vehicle or in a power plant, shall be a much lower cost per mile compared with any electrical cost generated from other sources. 

The enhancement of providing lower air emissions to atmosphere with the Relative Motion Engine shall also provide the fossil fuels industries with a grander future, for a much longer period of time, because

The cost comparisons made today of the future electricity sources, have not used our new and unique low-cost means, of our Relative Motion Engine design and method.  

We do believe that future market demand, will continue to share different kinds of energies, with a great share of the better internal combustion engines that are yet to be produced.