Time is a Form of Energy

---

· Established literature of Relativity as a Function of Time.

·  Physics theorist of the equivalency of Time and Energy ( E= 1/2 Mf *g^2 *t ) 

· Introduced Time as a field and a form of energy, rather than a dimension.

- Introduced the term and the physics of "Virtual  physica-Distance" as a measure of energy conservation when "Motion is a Function of Time" 

. Proposed Acceleration Time clock as a measure of physical distance  

· Introduced the Negative mass and the Negative distance in complex numbers.

· Introduced Pascal Law as a Function of Time.

-Patented and computer tested a Relative Motion Combustion Cylinder that can zero out CO and NO emissions, and can refer to the "Field Of Time" as magnets refer to the magnetic field..

This page is dedicated to introduce "Energy as a Function of Time". New "concepts" and "terminology" are needed. Methods of closing a system to motion as a "function of position", may lead to a mistake of generalizing a special rule.

In the center of our new physics, Time is identified as a field, just as physics previously identified the magnetic and gravity fields.

Hamilton teaches that energy is not preserved, when motion is a function of time and LaGrange equations do not stand. Our Relative Motion as a "Function Of Time" solves Hamilton statement, by equating time as a form of energy exchange, where energy preservation is re-established, but with time also becomes a source of energy.

Our Relative Motion as a "function of time", teaches that a net force, is not enough to calculate energy of an object in motion, simply because vacuum does not exist in nature, where every motion is part of at least one field ( yet a field role can be ignored when motion calculated energy as a function of Time = motion Energy as a Function of Position ).

      As a "Function of Time", we may have more than one dimension or one field of acceleration. that shall not be reduced to the sum of acceleration vectors, nor the object's motion shall be reduced to a particle subjected to a central net force. 

     To simplify the concept, we may suggest that a similar net force and a similar object would act differently, if the field of motion was different, like a simple field of gravity, fluid or electromagnetic, with different levels of pressure, or combined with a field of relative motion, like a surface and tidal waves acting on a ship, the acceleration vectors can be added to find out its  position, however such sum is not helpful to calculate energy needed for the trip.

No matter how complicated such a field can be, from an energy prospective; acceleration can only be of the power square, which shall not be reduced to the sum of two vectors, nor to classical vector multiplication, as we see incorrectly practiced in classical mechanics and in special relativity, whenever motion was a Function of Time.

While acceleration as a Function of position can be measured as a vector of certain magnitude at certain environment, The acceleration of the power square, shall be treated as a motion derivative that governs the relation between a virtual-physical distance and a pure-physical distances within a field, and measures the relation between (the field, the momentum and available potential energy).

 Cartesian geometry of energy in our Relative-Motion method, is a result of a volume created from area (calculated from the acceleration squared) multiplied by time lapse of acceleration as an elevation on the  X-coordinate, which opens any observed system to the equivalency of energy and time, rather than having energy calculated as a scalar.

     When motion is a function of time, second acceleration makes a continuous force-equilibrium relation between motion kinetics, and between its field, which is mathematically handled by integration.

      Pascal law in its most simple expressions is calculated as equivalency between work input and work output, where for each side (W= pressure * Surface *stroke Distance =pressure *Volume). 

In the case of our Relative Motion cylinder, as an example of Pascal as a Function of Time: 

Work input [W=pressure* (internal volume of cylinder MINUS space void by floating piston) ] is smaller than Work output. As a function of position, this would be considered as a case of non-preservation, however this controversy can be solved if time is considered a form and a source of such energy difference, where complex numbers is needed to calculate Work energy gain (W =space void *pressure ) or in another expression, energy gain from time = Negative mass * pressure. Not always we have the means to calculate space void available, as a negative mass, and another method of equivalency between input and output must be established for motion as a function of time, where we replace physical distance by virtual physical-distance, and where Virtual distance is measured by time (sec) under universal acceleration, like saying virtual distance equals one second, when an object average speed is 4.9 meter/sec

     Relativity as a function of time, is the method of calculating energy as a function of time, where acceleration is mathematically treated by equation of the second power, and by giving potential energy a Cartesian geometric volume rather than a scaler.

 The conservation relation between potential energy and time, is treated independent of the conservation law that governs potential and kinetic energies, where motion is a Function of position.

With these considerations in mind, we can advance to a very important example in applied physics " Pascal as a Function of Time" by saying:

• As a "function of position", Pascal can increase available force (Newton/s) for a loss in metric distance.
• As a "function of time", Pascal can increase available work energy ( Joule/s) for a loss in time lapse coordinate distance of acceleration. To have a mechanical design open to time, Relative Motion conditions need to be met.
• "Time lapse" under a chosen universal acceleration, is a new scale that is needed, to measure distance when motion is a "function of time".

s Energy is a "function of time", when acceleration is of the power square, ( in another term, a net force doest..do.os.

E = 1/2 *Mf *g2 *t  

where t is a measure of virtual physical-distance under universal acceleration.

1.   Energy is a "function of time", when acceleration is of the power square, ( in another term, a net force does not accelerate a particle as we calculate in a closed system).
2. Relativity as a "function of time", measures available work-energy output, and means of traveling a physical distance, at a different "time lapse" of a universal acceleration, despite equivalent initial thermal potential.
3. Acceleration under certain field equilibrium conditions may result in creating a non-particle negative mass (a space void).
4. Accelerating a Negative mass, or acceleration through a negative distance of a field,  is a source of energy, which must have been the method of how nature is feeding our universe with energy needed for its accelerated curve-motion. 
5. When work output is less than work input, then the difference is energy exchanged with time, and never a thermal loss, and with that we can better understand the "Direction-of-Time" as a method of energy exchange.

In the book of TIME , St Patrick statement that there was hell waiting for those who ask what was there before matter was created, meant that physics did not have any answer yet. 

Now, physics as a function of time can simply say, " There was TIME" , and Time was the initial foundation of energy.