The question

The question facing us today, is not how much more we can advance, but how we can advance safly without destroying our spaceship-earth.

We believe that better answers for this question could be approached by giving more attention not only to cleaner sources of energy but to safer ones that we might find in classical mechanics.

We do understand that a radical combustion advance can only help a transition through the next few decades. 

Magnets helped us in the past to understand and use the magnetic field, but we did not stop there, as we later learned from Nicola Tesla how to integrate the negative part of the electromagnetic wave into a working electric current. A step perceived initially by Tesla's professor, when Tesla was still a mechanical engineer student, as an inquiry into perpetual motion.

Similarly, deploying the Relative-Motion Engine shall introduce a better understanding of the motion as a function of time, or in other words, opening a mechanical system to "TIME" where the negative potential shall be accessible as a source of energy.

We expect that such understanding shall help us secure better answers and better designs of how we are going to produce energy more efficiently in the future, with cutting on all previous expensive sources, not only on the fossil and nuclear sources, but also on disruptive environmental projects like dams and wind.

Our planet’s new shape can look like dams removed and replaced by filtered water loops alongside rivers, safe to fish as well as to geological structures.  Seaside cities shall have its nearby water turbines installed some 300 feet under the water surface.

The new changes could also mean that a solid-state battery is also needed for a complete departure from Lithium pollutions and limitations, and for a successful deployment of electric and hybrid-electric where the RME can last longer in commercial vehicles.