Control emissions at the cylinder level

Relative Motion Engine Project

Learn the Enhancements of Our “Relative Motion” Engine Project & Capabilities of “Time” as a Form of Energy

  

Our Relative Motion Engine, is our lab tested technology for new combustion engines with inner designs and methods, of our “Floating Piston”  in each elongated Cylinder to literally 

Double its torque-horse power output potential,

Insure a much cleaner exhaust with internal cylinder control,

Minimize engine noise and vibrations,

And enhance the mileage from an 18 miles per gallon example to potentially 70 miles per gallon


Our Relative Motion cylinder hybrid design  

decreases the engine speed in half for a given performance

increases the power gained from lowering the  “ Acceleration Time of motion”

 decreases costs of future life time maintenance, by operating at the lower engine speed 

Applicable to both diesel and gasoline options. 

Patent pending U.S App 16235272.
 

Today, the capabilities of existing Conventional Engines’ Designs have: 

A wide Range of variable compression ratios, 

Bigger available air to fuel ratios, and 

With more efficient turbocharge recovery methods

Is breaking the limits of what we can expect from 

existing combustion engine designs and methods. 

Traditional Air Emission control is either a pre-engine management solution of removing sulfur or lead from the fuel, or an after-engine filter treatment. while

Our  Relative Motion Engine, is the only potential design and method that can provide a radical and Effective Air Emission Control at the cylinder design level, by increasing the mean effective pressure, ridding of the fluid freeze zone associated with higher piston speeds of conventional cylinders and providing better air to fuel ratios.



Capabilities of “Time” as a Form of Energy, And the equivalency of "Time & Energy", is in our Relative Motion Engine Design and Method

 To establish better scientific sense of what Relative Motion Mechanics could bring to the table, 

We would like to present to you a simple engineering problem, to put our reader on the same page with our web described mathematics and with our company’s mission.
 

Our Simulation tests of Relative Motion Operation were conducted using a typical combustion cylinder size, similar fluid compression ratio, and similar piston stroke distance, against similar load of resisting force. 

Initially we used indirect fuel injection, where Initial pressure reached a peak of 

three folds compared with the peak pressure of a direct injection, and 

engine Piston moved at average speed of two folds the speed

 after direct injection combustion, yet The direct injection method, is known to be more efficient.

(that is less initial pressure & less kinetic energy, then with the more effective direct injection). 

More detail of this discrepancy  is explained further in a latter part of our “Cylinder”  and "Physics"Sections.
 

De Rochas - Otto's Internal Combustion Principles” tie better engine performance to better initial pressure and better piston speed. 

While “direct injection” in a counter intuitive sense, has raised the present modern engines torque and horse power. 

(We compared Our Relative Motion Engine to Four De Rochas Principles, as shown in first part of our “Cylinder” Section).


Our Relative Motion Cylinder design and method of our “patent pending” “floating piston” in each cylinder, takes the lead from what makes sense, and from speculations, 

to provide a mathematical system equilibrium control

of the calculated work-potential input, 

and mechanical kinetic output, 

where the source of gain is rooted at 

increasing “mean effective pressure”, and

in relative gains of motion energy as a function of “time”.

Both gain factors cause a better equilibrium,

of transferring potential fluid forces to piston forces


Details and Mathematics, are presented in our partial “feasibility study” of “Time” as a form of Energy in our “Physics” Section, 

and to its capabilities presented in the latter half in our “Cylinder”  Section. 


As for the gain from Relative Motion "Time", using a Newtonian-relativity /Galilean transformation method in a “patent pending” statement, that was mathematically proved and evidenced by lab simulation testing, 

Our cylinder system motion provided an exchange of value, 

between the time-independent energy of “work potential”, and between work time index (time lapse of acceleration) of the system motion on a “time” coordinate.

Details and Mathematics are presented sequentially in our “Physics” Section. 


We look forward to meet interested business partners;

On a worldwide basis

to use our Patent Pending fossil fuel Relative Motion Technology for many productive years; 

to cooperate with battery operated vehicle technology; because we can provide a more consistent and cost effective electric supply, and 

to cover the commercial vehicle sector with hybrid at the cylinder level solutions ; 

Provide low CO and NOx air emission,  

All with lower industrial power-to-engine volume cost, lower operating cost, & greater thermal safety.


XXXXXXXXXX